Difference between revisions of "Talk:Item Definition"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This article should perhaps be rewritten or at least disposed and adapted for IV. For example see [[Item_Definition#2DFX|2dfx]], [[Item_Definition#AMAT|AMAT]], [[Item_Definition#MLO|MLO]], [[Item_Definition#TREE|TREE]] or [[Item_Definition#TANM|TANM]] --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 12:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | This article should perhaps be rewritten or at least disposed and adapted for IV. For example see [[Item_Definition#2DFX|2dfx]], [[Item_Definition#AMAT|AMAT]], [[Item_Definition#MLO|MLO]], [[Item_Definition#TREE|TREE]] or [[Item_Definition#TANM|TANM]] --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 12:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | :I agree with possibly making a IV only definition page due to the IV ide running in a different structure order to the current layout | + | :I agree with possibly making a IV only definition page due to the IV ide running in a different structure order to the current layout --[[User:Gforce|Gforce]] 01:56 22 July 2009 |
| − | --[[User:Gforce|Gforce]] 01:56 22 July 2009 | + | |
| + | ::Well I don't exactly know how far the IV format does differ from the current one, but I guess the lines do only got a different format - I suggest creating articles for each section and then write the IV format there. Just like we did for the [[IPL]] sections. --{{#if:Aschratt|[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]]}} - [http://www.aschratt.com oO] 11:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Article rewriting steps and timeline === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Writing articles for sections | ||
| + | ** [[OBJS]] – Update | ||
| + | ** [[TOBJ]] – Update | ||
| + | ** [[ANIM]] – Write this article. | ||
| + | ** [[PEDS]] – IV format missing | ||
| + | ** [[WEAP]] | ||
| + | ** [[CARS]] – IV format missing, perhaps some more detailed information about limitations and stuff... | ||
| + | ** [[2DFX]] – Incomplete? | ||
| + | ** [[PATH]] | ||
| + | ** [[TREE]] | ||
| + | ** [[TANM]] | ||
| + | ** [[MLO]] | ||
| + | ** [[AMAT]] | ||
| + | * This article | ||
| + | ** 1. '''!''' Confirm 'description' and 'version' of the sections | ||
| + | ** 2. Add description for [[TREE]], [[MLO]] and [[AMAT]] | ||
| + | ** 3. '''!''' Confirm 'description' and 'version' of the flags | ||
| + | ** 4. '''Find out redirects to now removed article sections (e.g. [[IDE#OBJS]]) – update or delete.''' | ||
| + | * Article [[Map System]]<br>Write an article descriping the interaction of the various files like IDE, [[IPL]], [[object.dat]] their sections and so on, in detail. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Can anyone please take a few minutes and to finish the confirmation points? If each point is confirmed remove the ''rewrite'' template from the article. | ||
| + | – Thank you!''' --{{#if:Aschratt|[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]]}} - [http://www.aschratt.com oO] 11:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
== (IV) procobj.ide == | == (IV) procobj.ide == | ||
I do not belive, that there is any difference between the formats inside the <code>procobj.ide</code> and any other IDE for GTA IV - also I do not see a difference written in here (instead of the WDD link is set to "null", which does not change the format itself). So is there any reason to keep the [[Item_Definition#Procobj.ide]] section? --{{#if:Aschratt|[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]]}} - [http://www.aschratt.com oO] 09:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | I do not belive, that there is any difference between the formats inside the <code>procobj.ide</code> and any other IDE for GTA IV - also I do not see a difference written in here (instead of the WDD link is set to "null", which does not change the format itself). So is there any reason to keep the [[Item_Definition#Procobj.ide]] section? --{{#if:Aschratt|[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]]}} - [http://www.aschratt.com oO] 09:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:55, 26 July 2010
I've updatet the Object-Flags, and added the tool I created to calculate them. Would be nice if anyone could test for some new! ;) --Aschratt 14:38, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
Disposing and Adaption
This article should perhaps be rewritten or at least disposed and adapted for IV. For example see 2dfx, AMAT, MLO, TREE or TANM --Aschratt 12:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with possibly making a IV only definition page due to the IV ide running in a different structure order to the current layout --Gforce 01:56 22 July 2009
Article rewriting steps and timeline
- Writing articles for sections
- This article
- Article Map System
Write an article descriping the interaction of the various files like IDE, IPL, object.dat their sections and so on, in detail.
Can anyone please take a few minutes and to finish the confirmation points? If each point is confirmed remove the rewrite template from the article. – Thank you! --Aschratt - oO 11:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
(IV) procobj.ide
I do not belive, that there is any difference between the formats inside the procobj.ide and any other IDE for GTA IV - also I do not see a difference written in here (instead of the WDD link is set to "null", which does not change the format itself). So is there any reason to keep the Item_Definition#Procobj.ide section? --Aschratt - oO 09:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
