Difference between revisions of "Talk:Relationship group"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I guess "Relationship groups" and the thing we call "[[Ped_type|Ped Type]]" are same? So, would not be better to move this information to the PedType article? <span style="font-family:Courier New">'''{{#if:Seemann|[[User:Seemann|Seemann]]}}<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Seemann|?]][[User_talk:Seemann|!]]</sup>'''</span> 05:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | I guess "Relationship groups" and the thing we call "[[Ped_type|Ped Type]]" are same? So, would not be better to move this information to the PedType article? <span style="font-family:Courier New">'''{{#if:Seemann|[[User:Seemann|Seemann]]}}<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Seemann|?]][[User_talk:Seemann|!]]</sup>'''</span> 05:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Oh sorry, Seemann... I haven't read your post here... Yes, I also guess they are the same. In San Andreas they have been defined in the <code>ped.dat</code> file, but this file seems to be ignored. However the relations can be changed using [[0746]]. --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 07:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | + | :Oh sorry, Seemann... I haven't read your post here... Yes, I also guess they are the same. In San Andreas they have been defined in the <code>ped.dat</code> file, but this file seems to be ignored. However the relations can be changed using [[0746]]. |
| + | :Same for [[Relationship types]]... perhaps we could merge those articles into [[Ped Relations]] or something like that. --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 07:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:01, 10 April 2009
I guess "Relationship groups" and the thing we call "Ped Type" are same? So, would not be better to move this information to the PedType article? Seemann?! 05:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, Seemann... I haven't read your post here... Yes, I also guess they are the same. In San Andreas they have been defined in the
ped.datfile, but this file seems to be ignored. However the relations can be changed using 0746. - Same for Relationship types... perhaps we could merge those articles into Ped Relations or something like that. --Aschratt 07:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
