Difference between revisions of "Talk:SCM Instruction"

From GTAMods Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Article name)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
– [[User:Squ1dd13|Squ1dd13]] ([[User talk:Squ1dd13|talk]]) 15:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 
– [[User:Squ1dd13|Squ1dd13]] ([[User talk:Squ1dd13|talk]]) 15:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 
:: Agreed that this article covers more than opcodes. Not sure what name would fit there. It should be a clear distiction between instructions in 3D and HD eras. Maybe SCM Instruction. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] ([[User talk:Seemann|talk]]) 05:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 
:: Agreed that this article covers more than opcodes. Not sure what name would fit there. It should be a clear distiction between instructions in 3D and HD eras. Maybe SCM Instruction. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] ([[User talk:Seemann|talk]]) 05:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 +
::: SCM Instruction sounds like a good name. Should we rename the page then? – [[User:Squ1dd13|Squ1dd13]] ([[User talk:Squ1dd13|talk]]) 11:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:05, 19 August 2020

Article name

The name "opcode" does not seem fitting for a page that describes the actual SCM instruction format. While the introduction suggests that the page is about the opcode alone ("Each script instruction is represented by a number called opcode"), the rest simply describes the format of instructions along with their arguments. As such, I propose that either the page's title is changed to something like "Instruction" or "Script Instruction", or that another page be created for the non-opcode information (which seems silly, given how little there is to say about the opcode itself).

Squ1dd13 (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Agreed that this article covers more than opcodes. Not sure what name would fit there. It should be a clear distiction between instructions in 3D and HD eras. Maybe SCM Instruction. Seemann (talk) 05:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
SCM Instruction sounds like a good name. Should we rename the page then? – Squ1dd13 (talk) 11:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)