Difference between revisions of "Talk:SCM Instruction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Article name) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
– [[User:Squ1dd13|Squ1dd13]] ([[User talk:Squ1dd13|talk]]) 15:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC) | – [[User:Squ1dd13|Squ1dd13]] ([[User talk:Squ1dd13|talk]]) 15:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Agreed that this article covers more than opcodes. Not sure what name would fit there. It should be a clear distiction between instructions in 3D and HD eras. Maybe SCM Instruction. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] ([[User talk:Seemann|talk]]) 05:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | :: Agreed that this article covers more than opcodes. Not sure what name would fit there. It should be a clear distiction between instructions in 3D and HD eras. Maybe SCM Instruction. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] ([[User talk:Seemann|talk]]) 05:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::: SCM Instruction sounds like a good name. Should we rename the page then? – [[User:Squ1dd13|Squ1dd13]] ([[User talk:Squ1dd13|talk]]) 11:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:05, 19 August 2020
Article name
The name "opcode" does not seem fitting for a page that describes the actual SCM instruction format. While the introduction suggests that the page is about the opcode alone ("Each script instruction is represented by a number called opcode"), the rest simply describes the format of instructions along with their arguments. As such, I propose that either the page's title is changed to something like "Instruction" or "Script Instruction", or that another page be created for the non-opcode information (which seems silly, given how little there is to say about the opcode itself).
