Difference between revisions of "Talk:00A5"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Those pages would benefit from the GTA3script syntax for the commands. I've been crawling documentation for IntelliSense and unfortunately parameter order here is not very helpful. Made a quick edit on how it could possibly look like. --[[User:Link2012|Link2012]] ([[User talk:Link2012|talk]]) 16:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | Those pages would benefit from the GTA3script syntax for the commands. I've been crawling documentation for IntelliSense and unfortunately parameter order here is not very helpful. Made a quick edit on how it could possibly look like. --[[User:Link2012|Link2012]] ([[User talk:Link2012|talk]]) 16:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, unfortunately custom ordering is an issue we have to live with for sake of compatibility with old tutorials and scripts. At the time there is no solid solution on that topic. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] ([[User talk:Seemann|talk]]) 20:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | :Yeah, unfortunately custom ordering is an issue we have to live with for sake of compatibility with old tutorials and scripts. At the time there is no solid solution on that topic. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] ([[User talk:Seemann|talk]]) 20:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The way the opcodes articles are structured right now, I feel like introducing syntax not from Sanny Builder's standard configuration will add unnecessary confusion. I did something like this in the past and I didn't like the result. Shouldn't the [http://gtag.gtagaming.com/opcode-database/ database at GTAG] be satisfactory if you want the standard parameter order?--[[User:Spaceeinstein|Spaceeinstein]] ([[User talk:Spaceeinstein|talk]]) 10:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:20, 16 November 2016
Those pages would benefit from the GTA3script syntax for the commands. I've been crawling documentation for IntelliSense and unfortunately parameter order here is not very helpful. Made a quick edit on how it could possibly look like. --Link2012 (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, unfortunately custom ordering is an issue we have to live with for sake of compatibility with old tutorials and scripts. At the time there is no solid solution on that topic. Seemann (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- The way the opcodes articles are structured right now, I feel like introducing syntax not from Sanny Builder's standard configuration will add unnecessary confusion. I did something like this in the past and I didn't like the result. Shouldn't the database at GTAG be satisfactory if you want the standard parameter order?--Spaceeinstein (talk) 10:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
