Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ped type"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(→IV Pedtypes) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{GTAF|422893}} --[[User:Ceedj|Ceedj]] 17:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | {{GTAF|422893}} --[[User:Ceedj|Ceedj]] 17:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:The one posted in here has been pasted from the ped.dat. If it is wrong feel free to correct it ;-) --{{#if:Aschratt|[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]]}} - [http://www.aschratt.com oO] 19:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | :The one posted in here has been pasted from the ped.dat. If it is wrong feel free to correct it ;-) --{{#if:Aschratt|[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]]}} - [http://www.aschratt.com oO] 19:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Thanks for that. Kind of surprised that would even be used, since A) it's one of the leftover files from SA, and B) that numbering scheme doesn't even make sense. I'll do my best, but someone else may need to clean it up, since I suck at teh wiki. :D --[[User:Ceedj|Ceedj]] 22:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 26 August 2009
IV Pedtypes
Who did this list? Because I've found plenty to contradict it. See my post at GTAF here for what I came up with:
GTAForums topic --Ceedj 17:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- The one posted in here has been pasted from the ped.dat. If it is wrong feel free to correct it ;-) --Aschratt - oO 19:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Kind of surprised that would even be used, since A) it's one of the leftover files from SA, and B) that numbering scheme doesn't even make sense. I'll do my best, but someone else may need to clean it up, since I suck at teh wiki. :D --Ceedj 22:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
