Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mission Scripting (Overview)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Rewrite: new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The ''Tools'' section is old and incomplete. ''Cracking the SCM'' is based on the Mission Builder syntax which is obsolete. And this article says nothing about variables, [[label]]s, [[thread]]s, [[script.img|external scripts]]. As this article is a Top 10 popular page, I believe it should be cleaned and improved. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] 02:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | The ''Tools'' section is old and incomplete. ''Cracking the SCM'' is based on the Mission Builder syntax which is obsolete. And this article says nothing about variables, [[label]]s, [[thread]]s, [[script.img|external scripts]]. As this article is a Top 10 popular page, I believe it should be cleaned and improved. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] 02:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == SCM Highlightning == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey, | ||
| + | there's one thing I'd like to add to the SCM highlightning. Look at this: <source lang="scm">:MYTHREAD01 | ||
| + | 0001: wait 1 ms | ||
| + | 0002: jump @MYTHREAD01</source> Now the label descriptions (@...) should be green, too, don't you think so? Also can we somehow create a backround box | ||
| + | like in this text? | ||
| + | This would look realy better, I think. --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 12:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:24, 31 January 2009
Jernej, why not correct/remove/extend odd phrases instead of making stupid comments? --steve-m 14:52, 17 Feb 2007 (CST)
Rewrite
The Tools section is old and incomplete. Cracking the SCM is based on the Mission Builder syntax which is obsolete. And this article says nothing about variables, labels, threads, external scripts. As this article is a Top 10 popular page, I believe it should be cleaned and improved. Seemann 02:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
SCM Highlightning
Hey,
there's one thing I'd like to add to the SCM highlightning. Look at this:
:MYTHREAD01
0001: wait 1 ms
0002: jump @MYTHREAD01Now the label descriptions (@...) should be green, too, don't you think so? Also can we somehow create a backround box
like in this text?
This would look realy better, I think. --Aschratt 12:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
