Difference between revisions of "Talk:Saves (GTA SA)"
(Unique Stunt Jump coordinates) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:ah, nice to see you again contributing to the GTA modding! I will add some save format info that I know later. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] 13:36, 2 Sep 2007 (CDT) | :ah, nice to see you again contributing to the GTA modding! I will add some save format info that I know later. [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] 13:36, 2 Sep 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Thanks, Seemann; it's good to be back. And thanks for the additions/corrections you've already added. [[User:pdescobar|pdescobar]] 17:34, 3 Sep 2007 (CDT) | ::Thanks, Seemann; it's good to be back. And thanks for the additions/corrections you've already added. [[User:pdescobar|pdescobar]] 17:34, 3 Sep 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Unique Stunt Jump coordinates == | ||
| + | |||
| + | How confident are you in the format of the Jump block? Orion_SR has been doing some testing with me and his contention is that the coordinates in that block are not the point/radius format seen in the SCM opcode but instead take the format "startXmin, startYmin, startZmin, startXmax, startYmax, startZmax, landXmin, landYmin, landZmin, landXmax, landYmax, landZmax, camX, camY, camZ" and I think the min/max format looks more likely after some quick examinations. [[User:pdescobar|pdescobar]] 19:00, 4 Sep 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:00, 5 September 2007
Note that the initial version is pretty confusing. Only the first block has been written in any detail and the rest are CyQ's shorthand notes from 2 years ago. It'll get better, at least those parts I have any understanding of will. ;) pdescobar 16:01, 1 Sep 2007 (CDT)
- ah, nice to see you again contributing to the GTA modding! I will add some save format info that I know later. Seemann 13:36, 2 Sep 2007 (CDT)
- Thanks, Seemann; it's good to be back. And thanks for the additions/corrections you've already added. pdescobar 17:34, 3 Sep 2007 (CDT)
Unique Stunt Jump coordinates
How confident are you in the format of the Jump block? Orion_SR has been doing some testing with me and his contention is that the coordinates in that block are not the point/radius format seen in the SCM opcode but instead take the format "startXmin, startYmin, startZmin, startXmax, startYmax, startZmax, landXmin, landYmin, landZmin, landXmax, landYmax, landZmax, camX, camY, camZ" and I think the min/max format looks more likely after some quick examinations. pdescobar 19:00, 4 Sep 2007 (CDT)
