Difference between revisions of "Talk:Item Definition"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Disposing and Adaption) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This article should perhaps be rewritten or at least disposed and adapted for IV. For example see [[Item_Definition#2DFX|2dfx]], [[Item_Definition#AMAT|AMAT]], [[Item_Definition#MLO|MLO]], [[Item_Definition#TREE|TREE]] or [[Item_Definition#TANM|TANM]] --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 12:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | This article should perhaps be rewritten or at least disposed and adapted for IV. For example see [[Item_Definition#2DFX|2dfx]], [[Item_Definition#AMAT|AMAT]], [[Item_Definition#MLO|MLO]], [[Item_Definition#TREE|TREE]] or [[Item_Definition#TANM|TANM]] --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 12:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | I agree with possibly making a IV only definition page due to the IV ide running in a different structure order to the current layout | + | :I agree with possibly making a IV only definition page due to the IV ide running in a different structure order to the current layout |
--[[User:Gforce|Gforce]] 01:56 22 July 2009 | --[[User:Gforce|Gforce]] 01:56 22 July 2009 | ||
| + | |||
| + | == (IV) procobj.ide == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I do not belive, that there is any difference between the formats inside the <code>procobj.ide</code> and any other IDE for GTA IV - also I do not see a difference written in here (instead of the WDD link is set to "null", which does not change the format itself). So is there any reason to keep the [[Item_Definition#Procobj.ide]] section? --{{#if:Aschratt|[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]]}} - [http://www.aschratt.com oO] 09:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 26 July 2010
I've updatet the Object-Flags, and added the tool I created to calculate them. Would be nice if anyone could test for some new! ;) --Aschratt 14:38, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
Disposing and Adaption
This article should perhaps be rewritten or at least disposed and adapted for IV. For example see 2dfx, AMAT, MLO, TREE or TANM --Aschratt 12:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with possibly making a IV only definition page due to the IV ide running in a different structure order to the current layout
--Gforce 01:56 22 July 2009
(IV) procobj.ide
I do not belive, that there is any difference between the formats inside the procobj.ide and any other IDE for GTA IV - also I do not see a difference written in here (instead of the WDD link is set to "null", which does not change the format itself). So is there any reason to keep the Item_Definition#Procobj.ide section? --Aschratt - oO 09:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
