Difference between revisions of "Talk:DAT"

From GTAMods Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Hhmm... I would leave out nodes from here, since they are no explicit data files. I would interprate them as a seperate field of modding. Data files in my oppinion are files which define behaviours and additional gameplay information related to the script, and so on. Paths are a bit too complex to be data files, since they are more mapping-related. (However San Andreas is the only game with the extension .dat. SA's ancestors used the IPL format and IV uses .nod to difference the files from explicit data content) --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 16:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 
Hhmm... I would leave out nodes from here, since they are no explicit data files. I would interprate them as a seperate field of modding. Data files in my oppinion are files which define behaviours and additional gameplay information related to the script, and so on. Paths are a bit too complex to be data files, since they are more mapping-related. (However San Andreas is the only game with the extension .dat. SA's ancestors used the IPL format and IV uses .nod to difference the files from explicit data content) --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 16:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 
:Ok, put it under the See also section as they are .DAT anyway :) [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] 17:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 
:Ok, put it under the See also section as they are .DAT anyway :) [[User:Seemann|Seemann]] 17:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
:: Deal :p --[[User:Aschratt|Aschratt]] 18:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:07, 20 February 2009

Hhmm... I would leave out nodes from here, since they are no explicit data files. I would interprate them as a seperate field of modding. Data files in my oppinion are files which define behaviours and additional gameplay information related to the script, and so on. Paths are a bit too complex to be data files, since they are more mapping-related. (However San Andreas is the only game with the extension .dat. SA's ancestors used the IPL format and IV uses .nod to difference the files from explicit data content) --Aschratt 16:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, put it under the See also section as they are .DAT anyway :) Seemann 17:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Deal :p --Aschratt 18:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)