Difference between revisions of "Talk:SFX (SA)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (grr) |
(→Bank sound limit: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: ZAZ had a mirror on SFX Directory ''(and web.archive has it archived as well)''. I don't think the other link ([http://ocain.kilu.de/gtasa_sasp/ Online SCRIPT SFX browser]) is recoverable since it had backend content involved. --[[User:Link2012|Link2012]] ([[User talk:Link2012|talk]]) 22:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC) | : ZAZ had a mirror on SFX Directory ''(and web.archive has it archived as well)''. I don't think the other link ([http://ocain.kilu.de/gtasa_sasp/ Online SCRIPT SFX browser]) is recoverable since it had backend content involved. --[[User:Link2012|Link2012]] ([[User talk:Link2012|talk]]) 22:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Bank sound limit == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does anyone know where the idea of the 200 sound limit for each bank comes from? Both my own tools and [[https://web.archive.org/web/20151026050556/http://pdescobar.home.comcast.net/~pdescobar/gta/saat/sfx_dir.html#SPC_FA|the SFX directory]] agree on the fact that <code>SPC_FA[0]</code> has 380 sounds and that multiple other banks in that package have over 200 sounds. This evidence seems pretty conclusive of the fact that the 200 sound limit is not correct, so for now I'll change the article to reflect this. – [[User:Squ1dd13|Squ1dd13]] ([[User talk:Squ1dd13|talk]]) 13:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:03, 29 August 2020
External links are outdated. Any mirrors? Seemann (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- ZAZ had a mirror on SFX Directory (and web.archive has it archived as well). I don't think the other link (Online SCRIPT SFX browser) is recoverable since it had backend content involved. --Link2012 (talk) 22:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Bank sound limit
Does anyone know where the idea of the 200 sound limit for each bank comes from? Both my own tools and [SFX directory] agree on the fact that SPC_FA[0] has 380 sounds and that multiple other banks in that package have over 200 sounds. This evidence seems pretty conclusive of the fact that the 200 sound limit is not correct, so for now I'll change the article to reflect this. – Squ1dd13 (talk) 13:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
