Difference between revisions of "Talk:00A5"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:The way the opcodes articles are structured right now, I feel like introducing syntax not from Sanny Builder's standard configuration will add unnecessary confusion. I did something like this in the past and I didn't like the result. Shouldn't the [http://gtag.gtagaming.com/opcode-database/ database at GTAG] be satisfactory if you want the standard parameter order?--[[User:Spaceeinstein|Spaceeinstein]] ([[User talk:Spaceeinstein|talk]]) 10:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC) | :The way the opcodes articles are structured right now, I feel like introducing syntax not from Sanny Builder's standard configuration will add unnecessary confusion. I did something like this in the past and I didn't like the result. Shouldn't the [http://gtag.gtagaming.com/opcode-database/ database at GTAG] be satisfactory if you want the standard parameter order?--[[User:Spaceeinstein|Spaceeinstein]] ([[User talk:Spaceeinstein|talk]]) 10:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The documentation provided here is much more detailed, and editable, which is a big plus for the future. I've implemented a crawler for GTAG and GTAModding: It tries GTAModding first, then, if no match, GTAG. I mean, the only thing that the crawler needs is the ''syntaxN'' entry with the original syntax. That is ''CREATE_CAR [int] [flt1] [flt2] [flt3] [var]''. Does it really add confusion? --[[User:Link2012|Link2012]] ([[User talk:Link2012|talk]]) 16:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:23, 16 November 2016
Those pages would benefit from the GTA3script syntax for the commands. I've been crawling documentation for IntelliSense and unfortunately parameter order here is not very helpful. Made a quick edit on how it could possibly look like. --Link2012 (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, unfortunately custom ordering is an issue we have to live with for sake of compatibility with old tutorials and scripts. At the time there is no solid solution on that topic. Seemann (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- The way the opcodes articles are structured right now, I feel like introducing syntax not from Sanny Builder's standard configuration will add unnecessary confusion. I did something like this in the past and I didn't like the result. Shouldn't the database at GTAG be satisfactory if you want the standard parameter order?--Spaceeinstein (talk) 10:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- The documentation provided here is much more detailed, and editable, which is a big plus for the future. I've implemented a crawler for GTAG and GTAModding: It tries GTAModding first, then, if no match, GTAG. I mean, the only thing that the crawler needs is the syntaxN entry with the original syntax. That is CREATE_CAR [int] [flt1] [flt2] [flt3] [var]. Does it really add confusion? --Link2012 (talk) 16:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
