Talk:Weaponinfo.xml - Revision history

Steve-m at 18:52, 2 February 2009

2009-02-02T18:52:58Z

Seemann at 20:44, 1 February 2009

2009-02-01T20:44:25Z

Steve-m: New page: == improvement suggestions == * keep the correct hierarchical structure of the xml * explain the elements and their parameters, treating them according to the well-known xml syntax, not as...

2008-12-31T03:27:59Z

New page: == improvement suggestions == * keep the correct hierarchical structure of the xml * explain the elements and their parameters, treating them according to the well-known xml syntax, not as...

New page

== improvement suggestions ==
* keep the correct hierarchical structure of the xml
* explain the elements and their parameters, treating them according to the well-known xml syntax, not as some random text file
* give examples, e.g. code snippets

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 2 February 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* give examples, e.g. code snippets		* give examples, e.g. code snippets
	:Well as I see it. First of all, a little introduction. Then the basic info on the file structure (it's xml, consists of a set of <weapon> tags within <weaponinfo> and so on). Then give the basic template for the <weaponinfo> (it can constist of <data>, <assets> ...). Each tag is a local link on a proper table with full explanation of parameters. Then... code snippets? Actually it will be better to see an existing example of the described XML document. [[User:Seemann\|Seemann]] 20:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)		:Well as I see it. First of all, a little introduction. Then the basic info on the file structure (it's xml, consists of a set of <weapon> tags within <weaponinfo> and so on). Then give the basic template for the <weaponinfo> (it can constist of <data>, <assets> ...). Each tag is a local link on a proper table with full explanation of parameters. Then... code snippets? Actually it will be better to see an existing example of the described XML document. [[User:Seemann\|Seemann]] 20:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	::Yea, that pretty much what I meant. But rather just quoting sections instead of the whole file (too long, legal problems, ...). --[[User:Steve-m\|Steve-m]] 18:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 1 February 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* explain the elements and their parameters, treating them according to the well-known xml syntax, not as some random text file		* explain the elements and their parameters, treating them according to the well-known xml syntax, not as some random text file
	* give examples, e.g. code snippets		* give examples, e.g. code snippets
		+	:Well as I see it. First of all, a little introduction. Then the basic info on the file structure (it's xml, consists of a set of <weapon> tags within <weaponinfo> and so on). Then give the basic template for the <weaponinfo> (it can constist of <data>, <assets> ...). Each tag is a local link on a proper table with full explanation of parameters. Then... code snippets? Actually it will be better to see an existing example of the described XML document. [[User:Seemann\|Seemann]] 20:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)